Amorphous has better indoor performance compared to crystalline in one test we conducted amorphous outperformed crystalline by 4x and we are constantly taking additional steps to make the material even better indoors.
Crystalline solar panels vs amorphous.
A special version of our amorphous material is available and optimized for indoor light sources.
Crystalline panels do not perform as well in partial shading compared to amorphous cells and they do gradually lose a small percentage of output as the temperature rises above 25 c.
They can also withstand the summer heat where mono or polycrystalline panels lose efficiency in the same ambient temperatures.
Amorphous is lower cost than crystalline although it s less efficient in converting sunlight to.
Quite often we re asked about the advantages of monocrystalline panels and polycrystalline solar modules over their amorphous thin film counterparts.
Crystalline panels need to be as perpendicular to the sun as possible to achieve the best performance.
In all our grid connect packages we only use good quality poly or monocrystalline panels except in very specific circumstances for the.
Particularly in home solar power grid connect systems and how they affect the life of a solar panel.